Contemplate the ant
Ants work toward a common goal. This might be understated. Consider when I say my liver or pancreas works toward a common goal. Or my cells. A human body has lots of types of cells. Perhaps these ants are just one dispersed big organism, albeit a slow moving one, due to the slow movement of the parts. some slime molds are occasionally considered a single organism under certain conditions. Why could not ants qualify to be a single organism?
Suppose someone comes along and says there is no creature called a human, just a bunch of cells doing a certain patterned behavior. (We say such such things about ants -- "the colony isn't a creature, the ant is.") So the human isn't a creature, but the individual cells are. What is the error? I think this might be the biological equivalent of the classic problem of the one and the many as noted in Philosophy.
REFERENCES
[image] "Visualizing nest architecture of the Florida harvester ant" Makezine (Accessed 11/22/2007)
[1] "Cuando ruge la marabunta" Flickr Uploaded on November 6, 2007 by elpaquito
O.
Labels: ants, emergent objects, ontology, problem of the many
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home